Burnet gre p. 79d-79eΣωκράτης
μὴ τοίνυν, ὦ ἄριστε, μηδὲ σὺ ἔτι ζητουμένης ἀρετῆς ὅλης ὅτι ἐστὶν οἴου διὰ τῶν ταύτης μορίων ἀποκρινόμενος δηλώσειν αὐτὴν ὁτῳοῦν, ἢ ἄλλο ὁτιοῦν τούτῳ τῷ αὐτῷ (79e) τρόπῳ λέγων, ἀλλὰ πάλιν τῆς αὐτῆς δεήσεσθαι ἐρωτήσεως, τίνος ὄντος ἀρετῆς λέγεις ἃ λέγεις: ἢ οὐδέν σοι δοκῶ λέγειν;
Aristippus lat A.D. 1154SOCRATES. Neque igitur, o optime, neque tu adhuc quesita virtute tota quid est, neu per ipsius particulas respondens enucleatum ire ipsam cuilibet, aut aliud quicquam hoc eodem modo dicens. Verum rursus eadem opus est interrogatione, qua existente virtute dicis que dicis, anne nichil tibi videor dicere?
Ficino lat A.D. 1532, p. 18,23-26SO. Neque tu igitur o vir optime, cum quæritur, quid ipsa in universum, ac tota sit virtus, partes respondens eam quærentibus patefacias, neque aliud quiquamque eodem modo respondens, sed rursus eadem interrogatione opus erit, quidnam virtus sit, qua subiecta ista dicis. Num aliquid tibi dicere videor?
Jowett eng A.D. 1892SOCRATES: But then, my friend, do not suppose that we can explain to any one the nature of virtue as a whole through some unexplained portion of virtue, or anything at all in that fashion; we should only have to ask over again the old question, What is virtue? Am I not right?
http://www2.hf.uio.no/common/apps/permlink/permlink.php?app=polyglotta&context=record&uid=71878bb6-4b54-11e5-99e8-001cc4ddf0f4
