lat 524 A.D. II,1pQuod si manendi abeundique scribere legem velis ei quam tu tibi dominam sponte legisti, nonne iniurius fueris et inpatientia sortem exacerbes quam permutare non possis?
ger Notker ca. 950-1022 A.D.Quid si uelis legem manendi . legemque abeundi scribere ei . quam tu sponte legisti dominam tibi . nonne iniurius fueris? Uuíle dû dînero fróuuûn dîa dû dánches kuuúnne . sézzen êa . uuío lángo si mít tír sî . álde óuh uuénne si rûme . neférest tu íro dánne únzálalicho míte na ? Et inpatientia exacerbes sortem . quam non possis perutare. Únde du mít úngedúlten bréstêst taz lóz . táz chît úngedúltigo léidezêst . tîa geskíht . tîa dû nîeht keuuéhselôn nemúgist. Táz ist rhetorica dissuasio . minime temptare . que non possunt fieri.
eng Chaucer 1343-1400 A.D.For yif thou wolt wryten a lawe of wendinge and of dwellinge to Fortune, whiche that thou hast chosen frely to ben thy lady, artow nat wrongful in that, and makest Fortune wroth and aspere by thyn inpatience, and yit thou mayst nat chaunge hir?
eng Elizabeth 1593 A.D.but if thou wilt prescribe her laws, to byde or parte, whom thou hast freely chosen thy gouurernesse, shoulst thou not be iniurious, and sharp thy luck with thy impatience, which change thou canst not?
http://www2.hf.uio.no/common/apps/permlink/permlink.php?app=polyglotta&context=record&uid=09d0d5a0-1c9b-11e2-b349-001cc4ddf0f4