syāt te buddhiḥ pratiṣedhapratiṣedho ’py anena iva kalpenānupapannaḥ, tatra yad bhavān sarvabhāvasvabhāvapratiṣedhavacanaṃ pratiṣedhayati tad anupapannam iti |
atra vayaṃ brūmaḥ | etad apy asad eva | kasmāt | tava hi pratijñālakṣaṇaprāptaṃ na mama | bhavān bravīti śūnyāḥ sarvabhāvā iti nāham | pūrvakaḥ pakṣo na mama | tatra yad uktaṃ pratiṣedhapratiṣedho ’py evaṃ saty anupapanna iti tad na |
此偈明何義 若汝意謂 遮與所遮亦如是者 彼不相應 若汝說言 我語能遮一切諸法有自體者 彼不相應
此我今說 是義不然 何以故 知如是宗相汝過非我 汝說一切諸法皆空 如是汝義前宗有過咎不在我 若汝說言 汝遮所遮不相應者 是義不然
khyod kyi blo la rnam pa ’di ñid kyis ’gog pa’i ’gog pa yaṅ mi ’thad de | de la khyod kyis dṅos po thams cad kyi raṅ bźin ’gog pa’i tshig ’gog par byed pa’i tshig gaṅ yin pa de yaṅ mi ’thad do sñam du sems na |
’dir smra bar bya ste | de yaṅ bzaṅ po ma yin te | de ci’i phyir źe na | khyed la ni dam bcas pa’i mtshan ñid kyis ’di ’thob kyi | ṅed la ni med pas de lta yin na ni ’gog pa’i ’gog pa yaṅ ’thad pa ma yin no źes smras pa gaṅ yin pa de mi ruṅ ṅo |||’di la skye bo chos kyi gnas skabs la mkhas pa rnams ni dge ba’i chos rnams la brgya rtsa bcu dgur sems te|
You may think: ’According to this very method a negation of negation also is impossible; so your negation of the statement negating the intrinsic nature of all things is impossible’.
-To this we reply: This also is false. - Why ? - Because the objection applies [only] to the specific character of your proposition, not to that of mine. It is you who say that all things are void, not I. The initial thesis is not mine. - In these circumstances, your staternent that, such being the case, a negation of negation also is impossible, is not valid.
Complete text
Verse 1-10