yadi ca kācin mama pratijñā syāt tato mama pratijñālakṣanaprāptatvāt pūrvako doṣo yathā tvayoktas tathā mama syāt | na mama kācid asti pratijñā |
tasmāt sarvabhāveṣu śūnyeṣv atyantopaśānteṣu prakṛtivivikteṣu kutaḥ pratijñā |
kutaḥ pratijñālakṣaṇaprāptiḥ | kutaḥ pratijñālakṣaṇaprāptikṛto doṣaḥ |
tatra yad bhavatoktaṃ tava pratijñālakṣaṇaprāptatvāt tavaiva doṣa iti tad na |
yat punar bhavatoktaṃ pratyakṣeṇa hi tāvad yady upalabhya vinivartayasi bhāvān | tad nāsti pratyakṣaṃ bhāvā yenopalabhyante ||
anumānaṃ pratyuktaṃ pratyakṣenāgamopamāne ca | anumānāgamasādhyā ye ’rthā dṛṣṭāntasādhyāś ceti || atra vayaṃ brūmaḥ |
此偈明何義 若我宗有則有宗相 若我有宗有宗相者 我則得汝向所說過 如是非我有宗
如是諸法實寂靜故 本性空故 何處有宗
如是宗相為於處宗相可得 我無宗相何得咎我
是故汝言 汝有宗相得過咎者 是義不然
又復汝說偈言若彼現是有 汝可得有迥彼現亦是無 云何得取迥
說現比阿含 譬喻等四量現比阿含成 譬喻亦能成此偈 我今答 偈言
gal te dam bcas pa ’ga’ źig yod na ni | des na khyod kyis ji skad smras pa bźin du || ṅa la dam bcas pa’i mtshan ñid khas blaṅs pa sṅon du soṅ ba’i skyon yod pa źig na ṅa la dam bcas pa ’ga’ yaṅ med do ||
de’i phyir dṅos po thams cad stoṅ pa gtan du ñe bar źi ba raṅ bźin gyis dben pa dag la dam bcas pa ga la yod |
dam bcas pa’i mtshan ñid kyaṅ ga la yod | dam bcas pa’i mtshan ñid las byuṅ ba’i skyon yaṅ ga la yod de |
de la khyod la dam bcas pa’i mtshan ñid kyis thob pa’i phyir khyod la skyon yod do źes smras pa gaṅ yin pa de yaṅ med do ||
yaṅ khyod kyis | re źig dṅos rnams mṅon sum gyis || dmigs nas zlog par byed yin na || gaṅ gis dṅos rnams dmigs ’gyur ba || mṅon sum de ni med pa yin ||
rjes dpag luṅ daṅ dpes gźal daṅ || rjes dpag luṅ gis bsgrub bya daṅ || dpes bsgrub bya ba’i don gaṅ yin || mṅon sum gyis ni lan btab po || źes smras pa gaṅ yin pa ’di la bśad par bya ste ||
If I had any proposition, then the defect previously stated by you would be mine, because it would affect the specific character of my proposition. [But] I have no proposition.
Thus [we observe:] When all things are void, perfectly appeased and by nature isolated, how can there be a proposition?
How can something affect the specific character of a proposition? [And] how can there be a defect, caused by the fact of affecting the specific character of a proposition?
- In these circumstances, your statement: ‘The defect is only yours because it affects the specific character of your proposition’, is not valid.
Complete text
Verse 1-10