syāt te buddhiḥ, yathā nāma kaścid brūyān mā śabdaṃ kārṣīr iti svayam eva śabdaṃ kuryāt tena ca śabdena tasya śabdasya vyāvartanaṃ kriyeta, evam eva śūnyāḥ sarvabhāvā iti śūnyena vacanena sarvabhāvasvabhāvasya vyāvartanaṃ kriyata iti |
atra vayaṃ brūmaḥ | etad apy anupapannam | kiṃ kāraṇam | satā hy atra śabdena bhaviṣyataḥ śabdasya pratiṣedhaḥ kriyate |
na punar iha bhavataḥ satā vacanena sarvabhāvasvabhāvapratiṣedhaḥ kriyate | tava hi matena vacanam apy asat, sarvabhāvasvabhāvo ’py asan | tasmād ayaṃ mā śabdavad iti viṣamopanyāsaḥ |
此偈明何義 若汝意謂聲能遮聲 如有人言汝莫作聲 彼自作聲而能遮聲 如是如是一切法空空語能遮
此我今說此不相應 何以故 以此聲有能遮彼聲
汝語非有則不能遮諸法自體 汝所立義 語亦是無諸法亦無 如是若謂如勿聲者 此則有過
dper na kha cig na re sgra ma ’byin cig ces bdag ñid sgra ’byin te | sgra des sgra zlog par byed do || de bźin du dṅos po thams cad ni stoṅ pa źes stoṅ pa’i raṅ bźin gyi tshig gis dṅos po thams cad kyi raṅ bźin zlog par byed do sñam na |
’dir smras pa | der yaṅ ’thad pa ma yin te | ’di la sgra yod pas sgra ’byuṅ bar ’gyur ba ’gog par byed pa yin gyi |
’dir ni khyod kyi yod pa’i tshig gis dṅos po thams cad kyi raṅ bźin ’gog par mi byed de | khyod kyi lugs kyi tshig kyaṅ yod pa ma yin | dṅos po thams cad kyi raṅ bźin yaṅ yod pa ma yin pas de’i phyir sgra ma ’byin źes pa lta bu’o źes bya ba ’di ni mi mthun par sgra smras pa yin no ||
You may think: When somebody says: ’Do not make a sound’, he himself makes a sound, and that sound prevents the other sound; in just the same manner, the void statement that all things are void prevents the intrinsic nature of all things.
-To this we reply: This also is not valid. - Why ? - Because here a sound that is existent negates the future sound.
In your case, however, it is not an existent statement that negates the intrinsic nature of all things. For, in your opinion the statement is non-existent, the intrinsic nature of all things is non-existent. Thus, it is like "Do not make a sound" is a defective proposition.
Complete text
Verse 1-10