yadi madvaco hetau nāsti mahābhūteṣu saṃprayukteṣu viprayukteṣu vā, pratyayeṣu nāsty
uraḥkaṇṭhauṣṭhajjihvādantamūlatālunāsikāmūrdhaprabhṛtiṣu yatneṣu, nobhayasāmagryām asti, hetupratyayasāmagrīvinirmuktaṃ pṛthag eva ca nāsti,
tasmān niḥsvabhāvam, niḥsvabhāvatvāc chūnyam | nanu śūnyatatvaṃ siddhaṃ niḥsvabhāvatvād asya madīyavacasaḥ |
yathā caitan madvacanaṃ niḥsvabhāvatvāc chūnyaṃ tathā sarvabhāvā api niḥsvabhāvatvāc chūnyā iti |
tatra yad bhavatoktaṃ tvadīyavacasaḥ śūnyatvāc chūnyatā sarvabhāvānāṃ nopapadyata iti tad na |
此偈明何義 若彼言語 因中大中和合中無 離散中無
咖喉脣舌齒根?鼻頂等諸處皆各有力 如是二處和合中無 若離如是因緣和合 更無別法 以如是故無有自體
無自體故我言一切皆無自體 空義則成
如此言語無自體空 諸法如是無自體空
是故汝言 汝語空故不能說空 是義不然
gal te ṅa’i tshig rgyu ’byuṅ ba chen po rnams daṅ mtshuṅs par ldan pa rnams daṅ | ldan pa ma yin pa rnams la yaṅ med | rkyen braṅ daṅ |
lkog ma daṅ | mchu daṅ | lce daṅ | so’i thun daṅ | rkan daṅ | sna daṅ | spyi bo la sogs pa daṅ | ’bad pa rnams la yaṅ med | gñi ga tshogs pa la yaṅ med | rgyu daṅ rkyen tshogs pa la yaṅ med | rgyu daṅ rkyen tshogs pa las ma gtogs pa tha dad pa yaṅ med do ||
de’i phyir raṅ bźin med pa yin te | raṅ bźin med pa’i phyir stoṅ pa yin no źe na | ’o na ni ṅa’i tshig de stoṅ par grub ste | raṅ bźin med pa ñid yin pa’i phyir ro ||
ji ltar ṅa’i tshig de raṅ bźin med pa ñid yin pa’i phyir stoṅ pa yin pa de bźin du dṅos po thams cad kyaṅ raṅ bźin med pa ñid yin pa’i phyir stoṅ pa yin pas na
de la khyod kyis tshig stoṅ pa yin pa’i phyir dṅos po thams cad stoṅ pa ñid du mi ’thad do źes smras pa gaṅ yin pa de mi ruṅ ṅo ||
If my statement does not exist in its cause and in its conditions ...,
it is devoid of an intrinsic nature and thus void. Now the voidness of this statement of mine is established because of its being devoid of an intrinsic nature.
And just as this statement of mine is void because of its being devoid of an intrinsic nature, so also are all things void because of their being devoid of an intrinsic nature.
In these circumstances, your statement: ‘Because of the voidness of your statement it is not possible to establish the voidness of all things’, is not valid.