| rab ’byor gang la la zhig ’di skad du | de bzhin gshegs pas bdag tu lta bar gsungs te | de bzhin gshegs pas sems can du lta ba dang | srog tu lta ba dang | gang zag tu lta bar gsungs so zhes zer na | rab ’byor de yang dag par smra bas smra ba yin nam |
rab ’byor gyis gsol pa | bcom ldan ’das de ni ma lags so | | bde bar gshegs pa de ni ma lags so | | de ci’i slad du zhe na | bcom ldan ’das de bzhin gshegs pas bdag tu lta bar gang gsungs pa de lta ba ma mchis par de bzhin gshegs pas gsungs pa’i slad du ste | des na bdag tu lta ba zhes bgyi’o |
“Why is that? If someone were to say, Subhūti, that the Realized One preached the view of a self, the view of a living being, the view of a soul, the view of a person, would he be saying the right thing by saying that, Subhūti?”
He said, “No, Lord. Why is that? Any view of a self, Lord, preached of by the Realized One has been preached by the Realized One as viewless. That is why it is called ‘a view of a self.’”
| bcom ldan ’das kyis bka’ stsal pa | rab ’byor byang chub sems dpa’i theg pa la yang dag par zhugs pa rnams kyis ’di ltar chos thams cad shes par bya blta bar bya mos par bya ste | ci nas chos su ’du shes pa la yang mi gnas pa de ltar mos par bya’o |
| de ci’i phyir zhe na | rab ’byor chos su ’du shes chos su ’du shes zhes bya ba ni ’du shes med par de bzhin gshegs pas gsungs pa’i phyir te | des na chos su ’du shes zhes bya’o |
ilaǰu tegüs nögčigsen ǰarliγ bolur-un : subudi a (48a)egün-dür bodisdv-nar-un kölgen-dür ünen-iyer oraγsad ene metü qamuγ nom-ud-i medegdeküi : ülegdeküi : taγalaγdaqui /buyu/ : kerken ber kiǰü nom kemen sedkiküi-dür ber ülü aγdaqui kemen /medegdeküi/ :
tere yaγun-u tulada kemebesü : subudi a nom kemen sedkiküi nom kemen sedkiküi kemegdeküi kemebesü : tegüni sedkiküi ügei kemen tegünčilen iregsen nomlaγsan-u tulada buyu : tegüber nom kemen sedkiküi nom kemen sedkiküi kemegdeyü ::
The Lord said, “It is in this way, Subhūti, that one who has set out on the bodhisattva path should know all dharmas and have faith in them. But he should have faith in them in such a way that even the idea of a dharma does not come to be present.
Why is that? This so-called ‘idea of a dharma,’ Subhūti, has been preached by the Realized One as idealess. That is why it is called the ‘idea of a dharma.’