Bibliotheca Polyglotta

(τὰ τρίγωνα) Πρῶτον μὲν δὴ πῦρ καὶ γῆ καὶ ὕδωρ καὶ ἀὴρ ὅτι σώματά ἐστι, δῆλόν που καὶ παντί· τὸ δὲ τοῦ σώματος εἶδος πᾶν καὶ βάθος ἔχει. τὸ δὲ βάθος αὖ πᾶσα ἀνάγκη τὴν ἐπίπεδον περιειληφέναι φύσιν· ἡ δὲ ὀρθὴ τῆς ἐπιπέδου βάσεως ἐκ τριγώνων συνέστηκεν. τὰ δὲ τρίγωνα πάντα ἐκ δυοῖν ἄρχεται τριγώνοιν, μίαν μὲν ὀρθὴν ἔχοντος ἑκατέρου γωνίαν, τὰς δὲ ὀξείας· ὧν τὸ μὲν ἕτερον ἑκατέρωθεν ἔχει μέρος γωνίας ὀρθῆς πλευραῖς ἴσαις διῃρημένης, τὸ δ’ ἕτερον ἀνίσοις ἄνισα μέρη νενεμημένης. ταύτην δὴ πυρὸς ἀρχὴν καὶ τῶν ἄλλων σωμάτων ὑποτιθέμεθα κατὰ τὸν μετ’ ἀνάγκης εἰκότα λόγον πορευόμενοι· τὰς δ’ ἔτι τούτων ἀρχὰς ἄνωθεν θεὸς οἶδεν καὶ ἀνδρῶν ὃς ἂν ἐκείνῳ φίλος ᾖ. δεῖ δὴ λέγειν ποῖα κάλλιστα σώματα γένοιτ’ ἂν τέτταρα, ἀνόμοια μὲν ἑαυτοῖς, δυνατὰ δὲ ἐξ ἀλλήλων αὐτῶν ἄττα διαλυόμενα γίγνεσθαι· τούτου γὰρ τυχόντες ἔχομεν τὴν ἀλήθειαν γενέσεως πέρι γῆς τε καὶ πυρὸς τῶν τε ἀνὰ λόγον ἐν μέσῳ. τόδε γὰρ οὐδενὶ συγχωρησόμεθα, καλλίω τούτων ὁρώμενα σώματα εἶναί που καθ’ ἓν γένος ἕκαστον ὄν. τοῦτ’ οὖν προθυμητέον, τὰ διαφέροντα κάλλει σωμάτων τέτταρα γένη συναρμόσασθαι καὶ φάναι τὴν τούτων ἡμᾶς φύσιν ἱκανῶς εἰληφέναι. τοῖν δὴ δυοῖν τριγώνοιν τὸ μὲν ἰσοσκελὲς μίαν εἴληχεν φύσιν, τὸ δὲ πρόμηκες ἀπεράντους· προαιρετέον οὖν αὖ τῶν ἀπείρων τὸ κάλλιστον, εἰ μέλλομεν ἄρξεσθαι κατὰ τρόπον. ἂν οὖν τις ἔχῃ κάλλιον ἐκλεξάμενος εἰπεῖν εἰς τὴν τούτων σύστασιν, ἐκεῖνος οὐκ ἐχθρὸς ὢν ἀλλὰ φίλος κρατεῖ· τιθέμεθα δ’ οὖν τῶν πολλῶν τριγώνων κάλλιστον ἕν, ὑπερβάντες τἆλλα, ἐξ οὗ τὸ ἰσόπλευρον τρίγωνον ἐκ τρίτου συνέστηκεν. διότι δέ, λόγος πλείων· ἀλλὰ τῷ τοῦτο ἐλέγξαντι καὶ ἀνευρόντι δὴ οὕτως ἔχον κεῖται φίλια τὰ ἆθλα. προῃρήσθω δὴ δύο τρίγωνα ἐξ ὧν τό τε τοῦ πυρὸς καὶ τὰ τῶν ἄλλων σώματα μεμηχάνηται, τὸ μὲν ἰσοσκελές, τὸ δὲ τριπλῆν κατὰ δύναμιν ἔχον τῆς ἐλάττονος τὴν μείζω πλευρὰν ἀεί. τὸ δὴ πρόσθεν ἀσαφῶς ῥηθὲν νῦν μᾶλλον διοριστέον. τὰ γὰρ τέτταρα γένη δι’ ἀλλήλων εἰς ἄλληλα ἐφαίνετο πάντα γένεσιν ἔχειν, οὐκ ὀρθῶς φανταζόμενα· γίγνεται μὲν γὰρ ἐκ τῶν τριγώνων ὧν προῃρήμεθα γένη τέτταρα, τρία μὲν ἐξ ἑνὸς τοῦ τὰς πλευρὰς ἀνίσους ἔχοντος, τὸ δὲ τέταρτον ἓν μόνον ἐκ τοῦ ἰσοσκελοῦς τριγώνου συναρμοσθέν. οὔκουν δυνατὰ πάντα εἰς ἄλληλα διαλυόμενα ἐκ πολλῶν σμικρῶν ὀλίγα μεγάλα καὶ τοὐναντίον γίγνεσθαι, τὰ δὲ τρία οἷόν τε· ἐκ γὰρ ἑνὸς ἅπαντα πεφυκότα λυθέντων τε τῶν μειζόνων πολλὰ σμικρὰ ἐκ τῶν αὐτῶν συστήσεται, δεχόμενα τὰ προσήκοντα ἑαυτοῖς σχήματα, καὶ σμικρὰ ὅταν αὖ πολλὰ κατὰ τὰ τρίγωνα διασπαρῇ, γενόμενος εἷς ἀριθμὸς ἑνὸς ὄγκου μέγα ἀποτελέσειεν ἂν ἄλλο εἶδος ἕν. ταῦτα μὲν οὖν λελέχθω περὶ τῆς εἰς ἄλληλα γενέσεως· οἷον δὲ ἕκαστον αὐτῶν γέγονεν εἶδος καὶ ἐξ ὅσων συμπεσόντων ἀριθμῶν, λέγειν ἂν ἑπόμενον εἴη. ἄρξει δὴ τό τε πρῶτον εἶδος καὶ σμικρότατον συνιστάμενον, στοιχεῖον δ’ αὐτοῦ τὸ τὴν ὑποτείνουσαν τῆς ἐλάττονος πλευρᾶς διπλασίαν ἔχον μήκει· σύνδυο δὲ τοιούτων κατὰ διάμετρον συντιθεμένων καὶ τρὶς τούτου γενομένου, τὰς διαμέτρους καὶ τὰς βραχείας πλευρὰς εἰς ταὐτὸν ὡς κέντρον ἐρεισάντων, ἓν ἰσόπλευρον τρίγωνον ἐξ ἓξ τὸν ἀριθμὸν ὄντων γέγονεν. τρίγωνα δὲ ἰσόπλευρα συνιστάμενα τέτταρα κατὰ σύντρεις ἐπιπέδους γωνίας μίαν στερεὰν γωνίαν ποιεῖ, τῆς ἀμβλυτάτης τῶν ἐπιπέδων γωνιῶν ἐφεξῆς γεγονυῖαν· τοιούτων δὲ ἀποτελεσθεισῶν τεττάρων πρῶτον εἶδος στερεόν, ὅλου περιφεροῦς διανεμητικὸν εἰς ἴσα μέρη καὶ ὅμοια, συνίσταται. δεύτερον δὲ ἐκ μὲν τῶν αὐτῶν τριγώνων, κατὰ δὲ ἰσόπλευρα τρίγωνα ὀκτὼ συστάντων, μίαν ἀπεργασαμένων στερεὰν γωνίαν ἐκ τεττάρων ἐπιπέδων· καὶ γενομένων ἓξ τοιούτων τὸ δεύτερον αὖ σῶμα οὕτως ἔσχεν καὶ γενομένων ἓξ τοιούτων τὸ δεύτερον αὖ σῶμα οὕτως ἔσχεν τέλος. τὸ δὲ τρίτον ἐκ δὶς ἑξήκοντα τῶν στοιχείων συμπαγέντων, στερεῶν δὲ γωνιῶν δώδεκα, ὑπὸ πέντε ἐπιπέδων τριγώνων ἰσοπλεύρων περιεχομένης ἑκάστης, εἴκοσι βάσεις ἔχον ἰσοπλεύρους τριγώνους γέγονεν. καὶ τὸ μὲν ἕτερον ἀπήλλακτο τῶν στοιχείων ταῦτα γεννῆσαν, τὸ δὲ ἰσοσκελὲς τρίγωνον ἐγέννα τὴν τοῦ τετάρτου φύσιν, κατὰ τέτταρα συνιστάμενον, εἰς τὸ κέντρον τὰς ὀρθὰς γωνίας συνάγον, ἓν ἰσόπλευρον τετράγωνον ἀπεργασάμενον· ἓξ δὲ τοιαῦτα συμπαγέντα γωνίας ὀκτὼ στερεὰς ἀπετέλεσεν, κατὰ τρεῖς ἐπιπέδους ὀρθὰς συναρμοσθείσης ἑκάστης· τὸ δὲ σχῆμα τοῦ συστάντος σώματος γέγονεν κυβικόν, ἓξ ἐπιπέδους τετραγώνους ἰσοπλεύρους βάσεις ἔχον. ἔτι δὲ οὔσης συστάσεως μιᾶς πέμπτης, ἐπὶ τὸ πᾶν ὁ θεὸς αὐτῇ κατεχρήσατο ἐκεῖνο διαζωγραφῶν. Ἃ δή τις εἰ πάντα λογιζόμενος ἐμμελῶς ἀποροῖ πότερον ἀπείρους χρὴ κόσμους εἶναι λέγειν ἢ πέρας ἔχοντας, τὸ μὲν ἀπείρους ἡγήσαιτ’ ἂν ὄντως ἀπείρου τινὸς εἶναι δόγμα ὧν ἔμπειρον χρεὼν εἶναι, πότερον δὲ ἕνα ἢ πέντε αὐτοὺς ἀληθείᾳ πεφυκότας λέγειν ποτὲ προσήκει, μᾶλλον ἂν ταύτῃ στὰς εἰκότως διαπορήσαι. τὸ μὲν οὖν δὴ παρ’ ἡμῶν ἕνα αὐτὸν κατὰ τὸν εἰκότα λόγον πεφυκότα μηνύει θεόν, ἄλλος δὲ εἰς ἄλλα πῃ βλέψας ἕτερα δοξάσει.

Principio quod ig(16)nis, et terra, aqua, et aer, corpora sint, nemo utique dubitabit. Omnis autem corporis (17) species profunditatem habet. Profunditatem vero planis constare necessarium est. Recti(18)tudo porro planae basis ex triangulis constituitur, atque trianguli omnes ex duobus ini(19)tium habent, habentibus utrisque rectum angulum unum, acutos duos. Quorum alter (20) utrinque anguli recti partem obtinet, aequalibus distincti lateribus: sed in altero inaequa(21)libus inaequalia distribuuntur. Igitur per rationes probabiles necessitati coniunctas in(22)cedentes, ignis ceterumque corporum huiusmodi ponamus exordium. Superiora ve(23)ro his horum principia deo nota sunt, atque ei qui dei sit amicus. Videamus igitur qua (24) potissimum ratione quatuor corpora pulscherrima fiant, dissimilia quidem inter se, sed (25) quae in se invicem dissolvantur, et ex se invicem generentur. Si id comprehenderimus, (26) veritatem ipsam de generatione ignis terraque et eorum quae competenti ratione servata (27) horum media sunt, tenebimus. Tunc enim nemini concedemus dicenti alicubi esse o(28)culis patentia pulchriora his corpora, quorum quodlibet secundum unum sit genus. Co(29)nandum igitur quatuor corporum genera pulchritudine praecellentia constituere, atque (30) ita asserere horum nos naturam sufficienter comprehendisse. E duobus trian(31)gulis Isosceles, id est qui cruribus constat aequalibus, unicam habet naturam: qui vero (32) altera parte est oblongior, infinitas. Ergo si recte exordiri volumus, infinitorum quoque (33) pulcherrimum praeligere nos oportet. Ac si quis pulchriorem a se electum ad horum (34) constitutionem afferre voluerit, eius non tanquam adversarii, sed tanquam amici sit sen(35)tentia potior. Unum itaque reliquis posthabitis, triangulorum multorum pulcherri(36)mum ponimus, a quo aequaliter triangulus ex tertio constitit. Ratio vero cur ita sit, pro(37)lixior esset. At eum qui diligenti discussione ita esse comperiet, dulce manet victoriae (38) praemium. Propositi sane nobis sint duo e multis trianguli, ex quibus ignis ceterorumque (39) corpora compositi sunt. Horum unus Isosceles sit aequalibus cruribus constans trian(40)gulus. Alter vero sit ille qui longius latus semper breviore latere potentia triplo maius (41) habet. Verum quod securi nimium in superioribus diximus, nunc magis est distinguen(42)dum. Videbantur quidem nobis, neque id quidem satis recte, omnia quatuor genera ex se (43) invicem generari. Profecto quatuor genera ex triangulis quos elegimus generantur. Tria (44) quidem ex uno, in aequalia habente latera. Quartum vero unicum ex triangulo Isoscele (45) componitur. Non igitur possunt omnia ita in se invicem resolvi et commutari, ut ex mul(46)tis parvis pauca ingentia vel converso efficiantur. Tria certe possunt. Cum enim ex uno (47) haec facta sint omnia, quando maiora solvuntur, multa exigua ex eisdem constituuntur, (48) parvas congruasque sibi figuras adepta. Rursus quando multa per triangulos dispergun(49)tur amplificata, unum unius molis faciunt numerum, magnamque aliam speciem unam (50)perficiunt. Haec utique de mutua ipsorum generatione dicta sint hactenus. Reliquum (51) est, ut qualis quaeque eorum fact sit species, et ex quibus concurrentibus numeris co(52)acervata, dicamus. Erit utique prima species, quae ex paucissimis composita fuerit, ele(53)mentum eius, quod latus oblongius breviori latere duplo maius habet. Cum vero bini hu(54)iusmodi secundum diametrum conponantur, terque id fiat, et diamtri latera breviora in idem (1) quasi centrum ducantur, unus triangulus aequaliter ex triangulis numero sex (2) conficitur. Trianguli autem aequilateres quatuor compositi secundum ter(3)nos planos angulos, unum solidum faciunt angulum: qui angulum planorum (4) omnium obtusissimum deinceps ortu subsequitur. Atqui triangulis huiusmo(5)di quatuor natis prima solida species totius circunferentis distributiva in par(6)tes aequales ac similes oritur. Secunda vero ex eisdem quidem triangulis sed se(7)cundum aequaliteres triangulos octo constitutis, unum facientibus solidum an(8)gulum ex planis quatuor, factisque sex huiusmodi, corpus secundum absoli(9)tur. At tertium ex elementis bis sexaginta copulatis, et angulis solidis duode(10)cim, quorum quilibet quinque planis triangulis aequilateribus continetur, ha(11)bens viginti aequilateres bases, nascitur. Iam igitur elementum alterum sic ha(12)ctenus ista genuerit. Verum Isosceles triangulus quarti generavit naturam se(13)cundum quatuor constitutus, et ad centrum rectos congregans angulos, u(14)numque quadrungulum aequilitaterem faciens. Sex vero huiusmodi copulati an(15)gulos octo solidos, quorum quilibet per tres planos rectos coaptus est, effece(16)runt. Corporisque ita constituti figura cubica est, sex planos quadrungu(17)los aequilitateres bases adepta. Est et quinta qaedam compositio, qua deus ad (18) universi constitutionem est usus, eaque descripsit et figuravit, quae contempla(19)tus aliquis non absurde dubitaverit utrum infinitos esse mundos an finitos exi(20)stimandum sit. Infinitos quidem dicere illius putabit esse proprium, qui nul(21)lam rerum cognitione dignarum peritiam habeat. Sed utrum unus mundus an quinque (22) revera nati sint inquirere, minus utique putabit absurdum. Ratio quidem nostra unum (23) ipsum verisimili probatione asserit esse natum. Alius vero quis ad alia respiciens aliter o(24)pinabitur.

[The manner of their generation was as follows:— The four elements are solid bodies, and all solids are made up of plane surfaces, and all plane surfaces of triangles. All triangles are ultimately of two kinds,—i. e. the rectangular isosceles, and the rectangular scalene. The rectangular isosceles, which has but one form, and that one of the many forms of scalene which is half of an equilateral triangle were chosen for making the elements.] In the first place, then, as is evident to all, fire and earth and water and air are bodies. And every sort of body possesses solidity, and every solid must necessarily be contained in planes; and every plane rectilinear figure is composed of triangles; and all triangles are originally of two kinds, both of which are made up of one right and two acute angles; one of them has at either end of the base the half of a divided right angle, having equal sides, while in the other the right angle is divided into unequal parts, having unequal sides. These, then, proceeding by a combination of probability with demonstration, we assume to be the original elements of fire and the other bodies; but the principles which are prior to these God only knows, and he of men who is the friend of God. And next we have to determine what are the four most beautiful bodies which are unlike one another, and of which some are capable of resolution into one another; for having discovered thus much, we shall know the true origin of earth and fire and of the proportionate and intermediate elements. And then we shall not be willing to allow that there are any distinct kinds of visible bodies fairer than these. Wherefore we must endeavour to construct the four forms of bodies which excel in beauty, and then we shall be able to say that we have sufficiently apprehended their nature. Now of the two triangles, the isosceles has one form only; the scalene or unequal-sided has an infinite number. Of the infinite forms we must select the most beautiful, if we are to proceed in due order, and any one who can point out a more beautiful form than ours for the construction of these bodies, shall carry off the palm, not as an enemy, but as a friend. Now, the one which we maintain to be the most beautiful of all the many triangles (and we need not speak of the others) is that of which the double forms a third triangle which is equilateral; the reason of this would be long to tell; he who disproves what we are saying, and shows that we are mistaken, may claim a friendly victory. Then let us choose two triangles, out of which fire and the other elements have been constructed, one isosceles, the other having the square of the longer side equal to three times the square of the lesser side. [Three of them are generated out of the latter: the fourth alone from the former. Therefore only three can pass into each other. The first and simplest solid, the pyramid, has four equilateral triangular surfaces, each formed by the union of six rectangular scalene triangles. The second species, the octahedron, has eight such surfaces, and the third, the icosahedron, twenty. The fourth, the cube, has six square surfaces, each formed of four rectangular isosceles triangles. There is also a fifth species. Although there are five elementary solids, there is but one world.] Now is the time to explain what was before obscurely said: there was an error in imagining that all the four elements might be generated by and into one another; this, I say, was an erroneous supposition, for there are generated from the triangles which we have selected four kinds —three from the one which has the sides unequal; the fourth alone is framed out of the isosceles triangle. Hence they cannot all be resolved into one another, a great number of small bodies being combined into a few large ones, or the converse. But three of them can be thus resolved and compounded, for they all spring from one, and when the greater bodies are broken up, many small bodies will spring up out of them and take their own proper figures; or, again, when many small bodies are dissolved into their triangles, if they become one, they will form one large mass of another kind. So much for their passage into one another. I have now to speak of their several kinds, and show out of what combinations of numbers each of them was formed. The first will be the simplest and smallest construction, and its element is that triangle which has its hypothenuse twice the lesser side. When two such triangles are joined at the diagonal, and this is repeated three times, and the triangles rest their diagonals and shorter sides on the same point as a centre, a single equilateral triangle is formed out of six triangles; and four equilateral triangles, if put together, make out of every three plane angles one solid angle, being that which is nearest to the most obtuse of plane angles; and out of the combination of these four angles arises the first solid form which distributes into equal and similar parts the whole circle in which it is inscribed. The second species of solid is formed out of the same triangles, which unite as eight equilateral triangles and form one solid angle out of four plane angles, and out of six such angles the second body is completed. And the third body is made up of 120 triangular elements, forming twelve solid angles, each of them included in five plane equilateral triangles, having altogether twenty bases, each of which is an equilateral triangle. The one element [that is, the triangle which has its hypothenuse twice the lesser side] having generated these figures, generated no more; but the isosceles triangle produced the fourth elementary figure, which is compounded of four such triangles, joining their right angles in a centre, and forming one equilateral quadrangle. Six of these united form eight solid angles, each of which is made by the combination of three plane right angles; the figure of the body thus composed is a cube, having six plane quadrangular equilateral bases. There was yet a fifth combination which God used in the delineation of the universe. Now, he who, duly reflecting on all this, enquires whether the worlds are to be regarded as indefinite or definite in number, will be of opinion that the notion of their indefiniteness is characteristic of a sadly indefinite and ignorant mind. He, however, who raises the question whether they are to be truly regarded as one or five, takes up a more reasonable position. Arguing from probabilities, I am of opinion that they are one; another, regarding the question from another point of view, will be of another mind.

Choose languages

Choose images, etc.

Choose languages

Choose display