For, if possible, let it be divided at D, so that again AC is of course not the same as BD, but AC is supposed greater; let a rational straight line EF be set out, and let there be applied to EF the rectangle EG equal to the squares on AC, CB, and the rectangle HK equal to twice the rectangle AC, CB;
therefore the whole EK is equal to the square on AB. [II. 4 ]
Again, let EL, equal to the squares on AD, DB, be applied to EF;
therefore the remainder, twice the rectangle AD, DB, is equal to the remainder MK.
And since, by hypothesis, the sum of the squares on AC, CB is medial, therefore EG is also medial.
And it is applied to the rational straight line EF;
therefore HE is rational and incommensurable in length with EF. [X. 22 ]
For the same reason HN is also rational and incommensurable in length with EF.
And, since the sum of the squares on AC, CB is incommensurable with twice the rectangle AC, CB, therefore EG is also incommensurable with GN,
so that EH is also incommensurable with HN. [VI. 1 , X. 11 ]
And they are rational;
therefore EH, HN are rational straight lines commensurable in square only;
therefore EN is a binomial straight line divided at H. [X. 36 ]
Similarly we can prove that it is also divided at M.
And EH is not the same with MN;
therefore a binomial has been divided at different points:
which is absurd. [X. 42 ]
Therefore a side of the sum of two medial areas is not divided at different points;
therefore it is divided at one point only.
Complete text
Book I