For let a rational straight line DI be set out, to DI let there be applied DE equal to the squares on AB, BC, producing DG as breadth, and let DH equal to twice the rectangle AB, BC be subtracted.
Therefore the remainder FE is equal to the square on AC, [II. 7]
so that AC is the “side” of FE.
Now, since the sum of the squares on AB, BC is medial and is equal to DE, therefore DE is medial.
And it is applied to the rational straight line DI, producing DG as breadth;
therefore DG is rational and incommensurable in length with DI. [X. 22]
Again, since twice the rectangle AB, BC is medial and is equal to DH, therefore DH is medial.
And it is applied to the rational straight line DI, producing DF as breadth;
therefore DF is also rational and incommensurable in length with DI. [X. 22]
And, since the squares on AB, BC are incommensurable with twice the rectangle AB, BC,
therefore DE is also incommensurable with DH.
But, as DE is to DH, so also is DG to DF; [VI. 1]
therefore DG is incommensurable with DF. [X. 11]
And both are rational;
therefore GD, DF are rational straight lines commensurable in square only.
Therefore FG is an apotome. [X. 73]
And FH is rational;
but the rectangle contained by a rational straight line and an apotome is irrational, [deduction from X. 20] and its “side” is irrational.
And AC is the “side” of FE;
therefore AC is irrational.
And let it be called that which produces with a medial area a medial whole.
Q. E. D.
Complete text
Book I