You are here: BP HOME > TLB > Nāgārjuna: Ratnāvalī > record
Nāgārjuna: Ratnāvalī

Choose languages

Choose images, etc.

Choose languages
Choose display
    Enter number of multiples in view:
  • Enable images
  • Enable footnotes
    • Show all footnotes
    • Minimize footnotes
DiacriticaDiacritica-helpSearch-help
ā ī ū
ñ
ś ź
š č ǰ γ    
Note on the transliteration:
The transliteration system of the BP/TLB is based on the Unicode/UTF-8 system. However, there may be difficulties with some of the letters – particularly on PC/Windows-based systems, but not so much on the Mac. We have chosen the most accepted older and traditional systems of transliteration against, e.g, Wylie for Tibetan, since with Unicode it is possible, in Sanskrit and Tibetan, etc., to represent one sound with one letter in almost all the cases (excepting Sanskrit and Tibetan aspirated letters, and Tibetan tsa, tsha, dza). We thus do not use the Wylie system which widely employs two letters for one sound (ng, ny, sh, zh etc.).
 
Important:
We ask you in particular to note the use of the ’ apostrophe and not the ' representing the avagrāha in Sanskrit, and most important the ’a-chuṅ in Tibetan. On the Mac the ’ is Alt-M.
 
If you cannot find the letters on your key-board, you may click on the link "Diacritica" to access it for your search.
Choose specific texts..
Click to Expand/Collapse OptionTitle
Click to Expand/Collapse OptionPreface
Click to Expand/Collapse OptionChapter 1
Click to Expand/Collapse OptionChapter 2
Click to Expand/Collapse OptionChapter 3
Click to Expand/Collapse OptionChapter 4
Click to Expand/Collapse OptionChapter 5
Click to Expand/Collapse OptionColophon
Hahn (1982) 24,17-20
na pratijñā na caritaṃ na cittaṃ bodhiniśrayāt |
nāstikatve ’rthato yeṣāṃ kathaṃ te nāstikāḥ smṛṭāḥ ||60||
Chi: 真諦, T.1656 494c7-8
無言行及心 由依菩提故
若說彼墮無 何因不墮有
Hahn (1982) 25,17-20
gaṅ dag don gyi med ñid du | | dam mi ’cha’ źiṅ mi spyod pa | |
byaṅ chub rten phyir sems med na | | de dag ji ltar med par bśad | |
Eng: Tucci (1934/36) 321,21-25
[For us] there is no thesis to be demonstrated, no rules of conduct, and on account of our taking shelter in the supreme illumination,
not even mind, our doctrine is really the doctrine of nothingness. How then can we be called nihilists?
http://www2.hf.uio.no/common/apps/permlink/permlink.php?app=polyglotta&context=record&uid=c7098a44-6be6-11df-870c-00215aecadea
Go to Wiki Documentation
Enhet: Det humanistiske fakultet   Utviklet av: IT-seksjonen ved HF
Login