Burnet gre p. 94eἆρ᾽ οἴει αὐτὸν ταῦτα ποιῆσαι διανοούμενον ὡς ἁρμονίας αὐτῆς οὔσης καὶ οἵας ἄγεσθαι ὑπὸ τῶν τοῦ σώματος παθημάτων, ἀλλ᾽ οὐχ οἵας ἄγειν τε ταῦτα καὶ δεσπόζειν, καὶ οὔσης αὐτῆς πολὺ θειοτέρου τινὸς πράγματος ἢ καθ᾽ ἁρμονίαν;
Aristippus lat A.D. 1156Igitur opinaris ipsum hec facere intelligentem tamquam armoniam esse ipsam, et que possit agi a corporis passionibus, sed non que possit agereque hec et dominari, et cum sit ipsa multo magis divina res quam secundum armoniam?”
Ficino lat A.D. 1532, p.(3) An putas Homerum haec dixisse tanquam harmonia quaedam sit ac talis ut corporis passio(4)nibus subijciatur, non autem atque dominetur, an potius quasi quiddam longe divini(5)us quam harmonia sit animus?”
Jowett eng A.D. 1892Do you think that Homer wrote this under the idea that the soul is a harmony capable of being led by the affections of the body, and not rather of a nature which should lead and master them--herself a far diviner thing than any harmony?
http://www2.hf.uio.no/common/apps/permlink/permlink.php?app=polyglotta&context=record&uid=e4f2202c-aa47-11e4-856a-001cc4ddf0f4
