Burnet gre p. 105aἀλλ᾽ ὅρα δὴ εἰ οὕτως ὁρίζῃ, μὴ μόνον τὸ ἐναντίον τὸ ἐναντίον μὴ δέχεσθαι, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἐκεῖνο, ὃ ἂν ἐπιφέρῃ τι ἐναντίον ἐκείνῳ, ἐφ᾽ ὅτι ἂν αὐτὸ ἴῃ, αὐτὸ τὸ ἐπιφέρον τὴν τοῦ ἐπιφερομένου ἐναντιότητα μηδέποτε δέξασθαι.
Aristippus lat A.D. 1156ast intuere utrum itatenus diffinias, non solum contrarium contrarium recipere, immo et illud, quodcumque inferat quid contrarium illi, in quocumque ipsum fuerit, ipsum inferens illati contrarietatem numquam recipere.
Ficino lat A.D. 1532, p.At vide iam num ita definiendum putes ut non modo contrarium non admittat con(6)trarium, verumetiam illud quod aliquid afferat contrarium illi ad quod ipsum accedat, (7) ipsum videlicet quod affert, nunquam contrarium eius quae affertur recipiat formam.
Jowett eng A.D. 1892from these examples (and there are many more of them) perhaps you may be able to arrive at the general conclusion, that not only opposites will not receive opposites, but also that nothing which brings the opposite will admit the opposite of that which it brings, in that to which it is brought.
http://www2.hf.uio.no/common/apps/permlink/permlink.php?app=polyglotta&context=record&uid=e56c55ef-aa47-11e4-856a-001cc4ddf0f4
