To add that, in the same way that the analysis of the chariot relates to the imputation of the self and what it assimilates, it is applicable to all other things as well:
A pot, a blanket, straw mats, armies, woods, a necklace, or a tree,
A house, a cart, a cottage, or else anything that it may be
These are not found to exist in any of the seven ways when subjected to the analysis of the chariot. And here it may be added: and yet, according to general consensus they exist. And other types of things of similar sort:
Should likewise be acknowledged as they’re generally made out to be,
… just as consensus thinks they are without analysing. And why?
Because the Mighty Sage would not with normal people disagree. (6.166)
As stated in the scriptures:
The world may quarrel with me, but I have no quarrel with the world.1
One should thus not discredit the general consensus of the world.
Title
Chapter 1: Pramuditā
