Rhet gre 1354b4-8τὸ δὲ πάντων (5) μέγιστον, ὅτι ἡ μὲν τοῦ νομοθέτου κρίσις οὐ κατὰ μέ(6)ρος, ἀλλὰ περὶ μελλόντων τε καὶ καθόλου ἐστίν, ὁ δ’ (7) ἐκκλησιαστὴς καὶ δικαστὴς ἤδη περὶ παρόντων καὶ (8) ἀφωρισμένων κρίνουσιν·
Rhys Roberts 1924 engThe weightiest reason of all is that the decision of the lawgiver is not particular but prospective and general, whereas members of the assembly and the jury find it their duty to decide on definite cases brought before them.
http://www2.hf.uio.no/common/apps/permlink/permlink.php?app=polyglotta&context=record&uid=c7b63083-1d51-11e7-ba66-0050569f23b2
