disc▪ Any relation between √QHW and √QHY‑ ? Huehnergard2011 seems to regard Sem *QHW, *QHY, *KHW and *KHY as almost interchangeable. His lemma qhw starts with “Also [!] khw ” and continues saying that Ar qahwaẗ‑ ‘coffee’ < ‘wine’ (originally perhaps ‘dark stuff’) is “akin to” Ar kahiy‑ †‘to be(come) weak’, Aram kəhā, qəhā, Hbr kāhâ, qāhâ ‘to be(come) dim, faint, dull’. He reconstructs the value ‘to be(come) weak, dim, dull, dark’ for Central Sem.