ID … • Sw – • BP – • APD … • © SG | 15Feb2021
√YTM
▪ YTM_1 ‘(to be, become) orphan’ ↗yatīm
▪ YTM_2 ‘…’ ↗… ♦ Semantic value spectrum in ClassAr (acc. to BAH2008): ‘to be one of a kind, to be the best; to become detached; an orphan, weak’
▪ DRS 10 (2012)#YTM distinguishes 1 ‘orphelin’ from 2 ‘être las, fatigué’ (attested only in Ar).
▪ Cf. in this context also the basic values of YTM in ClassAr as given by Badawi2008: ‘to be one of a kind, to be the best; to become detached; an orphan, weak’.
▪ Given that the value ‘to be detached’ is attested only in Ar while ‘orphan’ clearly is Sem, I tend to see it not as a distinct value (from an etymological perspective) but rather as a semantic extension: ‘to be detached’ = ‘to be as alone and detached as an orphan ’. From the orphan’s isolation it is also easy to imagine the figurative value ‘one of a kind’ to be derived. However, should also the ClassAr value ‘to be tired, unable to continue with s.th.’ be connected to ‘orphan’, or should it be treated, with DRS, as a distinct value? The ‘weakness’ of the orphan could have developed into ‘lassitude, fatigue’… As long as we do not have further evidence there are no decisive answers to these questions.
http://www2.hf.uio.no/common/apps/permlink/permlink.php?app=polyglotta&context=ctext&uid=dae75fd4-06ff-11ee-937a-005056a97067